PYQ Vault

Decide whether a statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency

This type of question, asked 9 times: 3 May 2023 S1, 11 May 2023 S2, 9 May 2024 S2, 20 Apr 2025 S2, 26 Apr 2025 S2, 13 Apr 2026 S1, 17 Apr 2026 S2, 19 Apr 2026 S1, 13 May 2026 S1. All 9 questions below, oldest first.

Try each one first, then open its answer.

  1. Question 1

    3 May 2023 S1

    107
    If pp and qq are statements, then which of the following is a contingency.

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  2. Question 2

    11 May 2023 S2

    142
    The following statement (p→q)→((∼p→q)→q)(p\to q)\to((\sim p\to q)\to q) is

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  3. Question 3

    9 May 2024 S2

    116
    Let p,q,rp, q, r be three statements, then [p→(q→r)]↔[(p∧q)→r][p \to (q \to r)] \leftrightarrow [(p \wedge q) \to r] is

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  4. Question 4

    20 Apr 2025 S2

    134
    The negation of (p∧∼q)→(p∨∼q)(p\land \sim q) \rightarrow (p\vee \sim q) is

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  5. Question 5

    26 Apr 2025 S2

    101
    Which of the following statement is a tautology?

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  6. Question 6

    13 Apr 2026 S1

    61
    Consider the statement patterns A. (q→p)∨(p→q)(q \to p) \vee (p \to q) B. (∼p∨∼q)↔∼(p∧q)(\sim p \vee \sim q) \leftrightarrow \sim(p \wedge q) C. [(p∨q)∧∼p]∧∼q[(p \vee q) \wedge \sim p] \wedge \sim q D. (p∧q)∧(∼p∨∼q)(p \wedge q) \wedge (\sim p \vee \sim q) then statement patterns

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  7. Question 7

    17 Apr 2026 S2

    60
    The statement pattern [(p∧q)→(∼p∨r)]∨[(∼p∨r)→(p∧q)][(p \wedge q) \to (\sim p \vee r)] \vee [(\sim p \vee r) \to (p \wedge q)] is

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  8. Question 8

    19 Apr 2026 S1

    64
    Which of the following logical statements is a tautology?

    Tap an option to check your answer.

  9. Question 9

    13 May 2026 S1

    66
    Consider the following statements: (i) ∼(p∧∼q)\sim(p \wedge \sim q) (ii) (p→q)↔(∼q→∼p)(p \to q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \to \sim p) Result 1 : (i) and (ii) are logically equivalent Result 2 : (ii) is a contradiction then which of the following is correct?

    Tap an option to check your answer.