MHT-CET Maths · Applications of Derivative
Increasing and Decreasing Functions
The sign of the derivative decides where a function rises or falls: f prime greater than zero means increasing, f prime less than zero means decreasing. Find where f prime is zero, split the line, and sign-test each piece.
Why this matters
This is the workhorse subtopic of the chapter — 29 PYQs sit directly here (9 HARD, 14 MODERATE, 6 EASY). The moves recur exactly: factor a cubic's f prime and read intervals, use a discriminant to prove f prime keeps one sign, take a rational or rational-trig quotient down to a constant-sign ad minus bc condition, or run a chain-rule sign analysis on a product with exp or log. The recurring MHT-CET traps live here too: the decreasing case needs f prime LESS than zero (so a rational quotient decreasing forces ad minus bc less than zero, not greater), an interval option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set, and a strictly-increasing cubic needs its quadratic f prime to have negative discriminant.
Concept 1 of 6
The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
Intuition
Definition
On an interval :
- for all is strictly increasing on .
- for all is strictly decreasing on .
Method (the sign chart): solve (and note where is undefined); these critical points split the number line into intervals. Test the sign of in each interval — a factored form like flips sign at each simple root. Where is , increases; where , it decreases.
Monotonicity from the sign of f prime
- f'(x)the slope of the tangent at — its SIGN is all that matters
Worked example
- .
- Critical points where : and ; they split the line into three pieces.
- Sign-test : on it is ; on it is ; on it is .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.on an interval means is?
- 2.First step to find monotonic intervals?
- 3.: where is ?
- 4.Where is decreasing?
Monotonicity is decided by the sign of , not by
Concept 2 of 6
Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
Intuition
Definition
For a polynomial:
- Compute and factor it fully into linear (and irreducible-quadratic) factors.
- The simple real roots of are the sign-change points. A product like is to the right of the largest root and alternates as you cross each root going left.
- A squared factor (double root) does NOT change sign — it touches zero and keeps the same sign on both sides.
Read off the increasing () and decreasing () intervals directly from the chart.
Cubic derivative factors to a quadratic
- r_1, r_2roots of ; the sign of flips at each simple root
Worked example
- .
- Roots . Sign of the product: on , on , on .
- Increasing where .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.: increasing set?
- 2.: decreasing set?
- 3.: increasing set?
- 4.Does a squared factor of change its sign?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q118 · 15th May Shift 2 · 2023]
An option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set
Factor before reading signs
Concept 3 of 6
Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
Intuition
Definition
For a cubic , (with ). Then:
- **Discriminant ** has no real roots for all is **strictly increasing on ** (no turning points).
- Symmetrically, with gives everywhere (strictly decreasing).
This is the standard way to prove 'increasing throughout the real line' or to impose 'no local extremum' as a parameter condition.
Strictly increasing everywhere
- B^2 - 4ACdiscriminant of ; negative means never touches zero
Worked example
- .
- Discriminant .
- Leading coefficient and no real roots, so for every .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.: sign for all ?
- 2.Cubic strictly increasing on needs (a quadratic) to have?
- 3., : sign of discriminant?
- 4., : does the cubic have any local extremum?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q118 · 15th May Shift 1 · 2023]
'Increasing throughout' is a discriminant statement, not an interval statement
is engineered to make the discriminant negative
Concept 4 of 6
Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
Intuition
Definition
For , the quotient rule gives
- ** increasing for all ** .
- ** decreasing for all ** .
The same collapse happens for a simple rational : . A parameter version (e.g. ) turns 'strictly increasing' into a linear inequality in the parameter.
Sign of the derivative of a bilinear-trig quotient
- ad - bcthe ONLY thing whose sign matters; increasing, decreasing
Worked example
- Quotient rule: .
- The denominator is a square, so it is wherever defined; the sign of equals the sign of .
- Decreasing means for all , so we need .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.increasing for all needs?
- 2.Why does the denominator not affect the sign of ?
- 3.: sign of ?
- 4.strictly increasing needs?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q120 · Shift 1 · 2023]
Decreasing needs : the sign FLIPS
It is , not
Concept 5 of 6
Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
Intuition
Definition
Differentiate with the product/chain rule, then isolate the factor whose sign is fixed:
- always, so in the sign is the sign of stuff.
- ; on the domain , the sign is the sign of .
- For a composite , each factor's sign multiplies. Reduce to the product of the non-trivial factors and build their combined sign chart.
The exponential factor drops out of the sign test
- e^{g(x)}strictly positive — never changes the sign of
- h(x)the remaining factor whose sign chart you must build
Worked example
- Product rule: .
- always, so .
- .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.: increasing set?
- 2.In , what decides the sign?
- 3.: increasing set?
- 4.: increasing set?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q125 · 16th May Shift 1 · 2023]
Don't sign-test the exponential — it is always positive
For a log, respect the domain before reading the sign
Concept 6 of 6
Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Intuition
Definition
Standard collapses that make the derivative a single sinusoid:
- Triple angle: , so .
- Power reduction: , giving .
Then read monotonicity from the sinusoid: ; . The longest increasing interval of -type functions is the length of one rising quarter/half of the sinusoid — e.g. rises on , a run of length .
Collapse to one angle, then read the sinusoid
Worked example
- Collapse: .
- .
- So ; the interval has length .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.Simplify .
- 2.: what is ?
- 3.longest increasing interval length?
- 4.needs?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q111 · 2nd May Shift 1 · 2023]
Collapse to one angle BEFORE differentiating
Mind the when scaling the interval
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (6)
- The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
Monotonicity from the sign of f prime
- Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
Cubic derivative factors to a quadratic
- Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
Strictly increasing everywhere
- Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
Sign of the derivative of a bilinear-trig quotient
- Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
The exponential factor drops out of the sign test
- Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Collapse to one angle, then read the sinusoid
Watch out for (11)
- Monotonicity is decided by the sign of , not by→ The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
- An option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set→ Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
- Factor before reading signs→ Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
- 'Increasing throughout' is a discriminant statement, not an interval statement→ Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
- is engineered to make the discriminant negative→ Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
- Decreasing needs : the sign FLIPS→ Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
- It is , not→ Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
- Don't sign-test the exponential — it is always positive→ Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
- For a log, respect the domain before reading the sign→ Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
- Collapse to one angle BEFORE differentiating→ Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
- Mind the when scaling the interval→ Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Mastery check — 5 interleaved questions
Try each one before clicking. Questions are interleaved across the concepts above, not grouped — interleaving sharpens transfer.
[Q111 · 3rd May 2nd Shift · 2023]
[Q114 · 9th May Shift 2 · 2024]
[Q123 · 3rd May Shift 2 · 2023]
[Q116 · 21 April Shift II · 2025]
[Q120 · 9th May Shift 1 · 2023]
Drill every past-year question on this subtopic
29 questions from the bank — paginated, with cart and Word-export support.