MHT-CET Maths · Applications of Derivative
Increasing and Decreasing Functions
The sign of the derivative decides where a function rises or falls: f prime greater than zero means increasing, f prime less than zero means decreasing. Find where f prime is zero, split the line, and sign-test each piece.
Why this matters
This is the workhorse subtopic of the chapter — 29 PYQs sit directly here (9 HARD, 14 MODERATE, 6 EASY). The moves recur exactly: factor a cubic's f prime and read intervals, use a discriminant to prove f prime keeps one sign, take a rational or rational-trig quotient down to a constant-sign ad minus bc condition, or run a chain-rule sign analysis on a product with exp or log. The recurring MHT-CET traps live here too: the decreasing case needs f prime LESS than zero (so a rational quotient decreasing forces ad minus bc less than zero, not greater), an interval option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set, and a strictly-increasing cubic needs its quadratic f prime to have negative discriminant.
Concept 1 of 6: The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
Definition
On an interval :
- for all is strictly increasing on .
- for all is strictly decreasing on .
Method (the sign chart): solve (and note where is undefined); these critical points split the number line into intervals. Test the sign of in each interval — a factored form like flips sign at each simple root. Where is , increases; where , it decreases.
Monotonicity from the sign of f prime
- f'(x)the slope of the tangent at — its SIGN is all that matters
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Monotonicity is decided by the sign of , not by
Concept 2 of 6: Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
Definition
For a polynomial:
- Compute and factor it fully into linear (and irreducible-quadratic) factors.
- The simple real roots of are the sign-change points. A product like is to the right of the largest root and alternates as you cross each root going left.
- A squared factor (double root) does NOT change sign — it touches zero and keeps the same sign on both sides.
Read off the increasing () and decreasing () intervals directly from the chart.
Cubic derivative factors to a quadratic
- r_1, r_2roots of ; the sign of flips at each simple root
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Applications of Derivative · Increasing and Decreasing Functions
An option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set
Factor before reading signs
Concept 3 of 6: Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
Definition
For a cubic , (with ). Then:
- Discriminant has no real roots for all is strictly increasing on (no turning points).
- Symmetrically, with gives everywhere (strictly decreasing).
This is the standard way to prove 'increasing throughout the real line' or to impose 'no local extremum' as a parameter condition.
Strictly increasing everywhere
- B^2 - 4ACdiscriminant of ; negative means never touches zero
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Applications of Derivative · Increasing and Decreasing Functions
'Increasing throughout' is a discriminant statement, not an interval statement
is engineered to make the discriminant negative
Concept 4 of 6: Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
Definition
For , the quotient rule gives
- increasing for all .
- decreasing for all .
The same collapse happens for a simple rational : . A parameter version (e.g. ) turns 'strictly increasing' into a linear inequality in the parameter.
Sign of the derivative of a bilinear-trig quotient
- ad - bcthe ONLY thing whose sign matters; increasing, decreasing
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 4 · Applications of Derivative · Increasing and Decreasing Functions
Decreasing needs : the sign FLIPS
It is , not
Concept 5 of 6: Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
Definition
Differentiate with the product/chain rule, then isolate the factor whose sign is fixed:
- always, so in the sign is the sign of stuff.
- ; on the domain , the sign is the sign of .
- For a composite , each factor's sign multiplies. Reduce to the product of the non-trivial factors and build their combined sign chart.
The exponential factor drops out of the sign test
- e^{g(x)}strictly positive — never changes the sign of
- h(x)the remaining factor whose sign chart you must build
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 5 · Applications of Derivative · Increasing and Decreasing Functions
Don't sign-test the exponential — it is always positive
For a log, respect the domain before reading the sign
Concept 6 of 6: Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Definition
Standard collapses that make the derivative a single sinusoid:
- Triple angle: , so .
- Power reduction: , giving .
Then read monotonicity from the sinusoid: ; . The longest increasing interval of -type functions is the length of one rising quarter/half of the sinusoid — e.g. rises on , a run of length .
Collapse to one angle, then read the sinusoid
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 6 · Applications of Derivative · Increasing and Decreasing Functions
Collapse to one angle BEFORE differentiating
Mind the when scaling the interval
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (6)
- The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
Monotonicity from the sign of f prime
- Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
Cubic derivative factors to a quadratic
- Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
Strictly increasing everywhere
- Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
Sign of the derivative of a bilinear-trig quotient
- Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
The exponential factor drops out of the sign test
- Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Collapse to one angle, then read the sinusoid
Watch out for (11)
- Monotonicity is decided by the sign of , not by→ The Sign of the Derivative Decides Monotonicity
- An option must be a SUBSET of the true monotonic set→ Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
- Factor before reading signs→ Polynomial Monotonicity via a Factored Derivative
- 'Increasing throughout' is a discriminant statement, not an interval statement→ Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
- is engineered to make the discriminant negative→ Discriminant Test for a Strictly Monotonic Cubic
- Decreasing needs : the sign FLIPS→ Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
- It is , not→ Rational and Rational-Trig Quotients: the ad minus bc Condition
- Don't sign-test the exponential — it is always positive→ Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
- For a log, respect the domain before reading the sign→ Products and Composites with exp and log: Chain-Rule Sign Analysis
- Collapse to one angle BEFORE differentiating→ Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
- Mind the when scaling the interval→ Trigonometric Monotonicity: Reduce to a Single Sinusoid
Test yourself on Applications of Derivative
20 past MHT-CET questions from this chapter, timed at 36 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.