MHT-CET Maths · Definite Integration
Evaluating Definite Integrals — Standard Forms, Algebraic Substitution and By Parts
A definite integral is an antiderivative evaluated between two limits — every Indefinite Integration technique carries over, with one new discipline: when you substitute, move the limits with you.
Why this matters
45 PYQs at 42% HARD, the largest page in the chapter, and every one of them is a technique from the Indefinite Integration chapter with limits attached: splitting a numerator against a quadratic, completing a square, partial fractions, a root substitution, by parts on an inverse trig function. What is new is bookkeeping — changing the limits with the substitution and evaluating cleanly — and the reduction formula for powers of tan, which appears here and nowhere else. The page is worth working slowly once, because the three property pages that follow assume you can finish an integral once the property has reduced it.
Concept 1 of 5: The Fundamental Theorem: Evaluate the Antiderivative at the Limits
Definition
- , where .
- Reversing the limits changes the sign: . Splitting at any point : — this is what makes piecewise integrands possible.
- The answer is a number (or an expression in the given constants); a in a definite answer is always wrong.
- Use the same standard formulae as Indefinite Integration: , , , and so on.
- Keep every sign: with a negative is where marks are lost.
Fundamental theorem and two properties
- any antiderivative of
Worked example
Practise this concept4 quick reps
Dropping the lower limit's sign
Concept 2 of 5: Standard Forms with Limits — Split the Numerator, Complete the Square, Partial Fractions
Definition
- Linear over quadratic: write ; the first gives , the second .
- Complete the square for ; with a power below use .
- Partial fractions for ; the answer is a combination of logs that the options write as a single , so combine: .
- Evaluate each piece at both limits before simplifying logs — is cleaner than carrying around.
Linear numerator over a quadratic
Worked example
Practise this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Definite Integration · Evaluating Definite Integrals — Standard Forms, Algebraic Substitution and By Parts
Forgetting the half in the log piece
Concept 3 of 5: Substitution — Change the Limits, Never Substitute Back
Definition
- Procedure: choose ; write in terms of ; convert both limits; integrate in ; evaluate. Do not convert the antiderivative back to .
- Root substitutions: turns into ; turns into .
- Trigonometric substitution: for (then ); for — or rationalise it to and integrate directly.
- Manufactured substitutions: , so with . Look for the derivative of the bracket sitting outside it.
- A negative or reversed limits after substitution is normal — carry the sign, then flip the limits.
Substitution with limits
Worked example
Practise this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Definite Integration · Evaluating Definite Integrals — Standard Forms, Algebraic Substitution and By Parts
Substituting back and using the old limits on the new variable
The option that hides in the log
Concept 4 of 5: By Parts with Limits — Inverse Trig Integrands and eˣ(f + f′)
Definition
- By parts with limits: . Evaluate the bracket immediately; only the remaining integral needs work.
- Inverse trig alone: take (or ), . Then ; .
- : . Recognise it before integrating: , so the answer is .
- Polynomial times exponential (): by parts twice, or the tabular method; .
- A stem that defines by , means ; read the definition, then integrate.
By parts and the e^x(f + f′) shortcut
Worked example
Practise this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 4 · Definite Integration · Evaluating Definite Integrals — Standard Forms, Algebraic Substitution and By Parts
Not spotting f + f′
Concept 5 of 5: Reduction: I_n + I_{n−2} for Powers of tan
Definition
- With : .
- So , : the answer is .
- The same trick with on , and with via .
- If a single is asked, apply the relation repeatedly down to or .
tan-power reduction on [0, π/4]
Worked example
Practise this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 5 · Definite Integration · Evaluating Definite Integrals — Standard Forms, Algebraic Substitution and By Parts
Answering 1/(n+1) instead of 1/(n−1)
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (5)
- The Fundamental Theorem: Evaluate the Antiderivative at the Limits
Fundamental theorem and two properties
- Standard Forms with Limits — Split the Numerator, Complete the Square, Partial Fractions
Linear numerator over a quadratic
- Substitution — Change the Limits, Never Substitute Back
Substitution with limits
- By Parts with Limits — Inverse Trig Integrands and eˣ(f + f′)
By parts and the e^x(f + f′) shortcut
- Reduction: I_n + I_{n−2} for Powers of tan
tan-power reduction on [0, π/4]
Watch out for (6)
- Dropping the lower limit's sign→ The Fundamental Theorem: Evaluate the Antiderivative at the Limits
- Forgetting the half in the log piece→ Standard Forms with Limits — Split the Numerator, Complete the Square, Partial Fractions
- Substituting back and using the old limits on the new variable→ Substitution — Change the Limits, Never Substitute Back
- The option that hides in the log→ Substitution — Change the Limits, Never Substitute Back
- Not spotting f + f′→ By Parts with Limits — Inverse Trig Integrands and eˣ(f + f′)
- Answering 1/(n+1) instead of 1/(n−1)→ Reduction: I_n + I_{n−2} for Powers of tan
Test yourself on Definite Integration
20 past MHT-CET questions from this chapter, timed at 36 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.