MHT-CET Maths · Differentiation
Inverse Functions and Inverse Trigonometric Differentiation
Differentiating an inverse function by reciprocal-of-the-slope, and taming messy inverse-trig expressions by a single trig substitution that collapses them to a constant times an angle.
Why this matters
This is the heart of the chapter — 29 PYQs sit here, the biggest subtopic by far, and the hardest (13 HARD, 14 MODERATE, only 2 EASY). Almost every question is one disguised skill: a fearsome-looking sin-inverse / tan-inverse / cos-inverse argument that, after the RIGHT trig substitution, simplifies to a constant multiple of an angle and differentiates in one line. Recognise the standard argument shapes (the substitution table) and these go from 'impossible' to 'instant'.
Concept 1 of 6
Derivative of an Inverse Function
Intuition
Definition
If is the inverse of , then . Differentiating both sides by the chain rule, , so:
- — the derivative of the inverse is the reciprocal of evaluated at , not at .
- To use it at a point : first find (the input that makes ), then .
- Geometrically: and are reflections across ; the slope at a point and the slope at its mirror image are reciprocals.
Derivative of an inverse function
- g(x)the inverse — the input that maps to under
- f'(g(x))slope of at the matching point, NOT
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q127 · 4th May Shift 1 · 2023]
Evaluate at , never at
You rarely need the formula for
Concept 2 of 6
The Inverse Trigonometric Derivative Table
Intuition
Definition
Learn these six cold — they are reflexes:
- ,
- ,
- ,
For an inner function, chain through: , and similarly for the rest. A handy identity for direct work: and — drawing the right triangle reads these off instantly.
Chain rule on an inverse-trig function
- uthe inner function (e.g. , , )
- du/dxderivative of the inner function — never forget it
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q126 · 3rd May 2nd Shift · 2023]
Don't forget the inner derivative
The minus sign rides on the 'co' functions
and derivatives carry
Concept 3 of 6
Collapsing Inverse-Trig with a Substitution
Intuition
Definition
Pick the substitution that matches the argument's shape, then read off the standard collapse:
- turns: ; ; ; .
- turns: ; .
- turns: ; and the half-angle .
After substituting, etc., so e.g. and . Branch care: only when lies in the principal range ; outside it the collapse picks up a sign or a correction.
The two workhorse collapses
- use when the argument is a sine multiple-angle (, )
- use when the argument is a tangent/double-angle ratio
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q114 · 9th May Shift 2 · 2023]
Match the substitution to the argument's shape
Watch the principal-value branch
Exponential/log inner functions hide the same shapes
Concept 4 of 6
tan inverse Addition and Complementary Identities
Intuition
Definition
Two identities do almost all the work here:
- Arctan addition/subtraction: (subject to range/branch). Run it BACKWARDS: a fraction of the shape splits as .
- Complementary identity: (constant!), and likewise and .
Because a constant has zero derivative, recognising these saves the entire calculation — the answer to 'differentiate ' is simply .
Arctan addition + complementary pair
- 1 - xydenominator of the combined argument; sign flips for the subtraction form
- the constant a complementary pair collapses to — derivative
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q119 · Shift 1 · 2023]
The constant differentiates to zero — but only if you SEE it
Mind the sign and the validity range
Concept 5 of 6
Differentiating One Inverse-Trig with Respect to Another
Intuition
Definition
To find where and are both inverse-trig in :
- Choose ONE substitution (, , or ) that collapses both.
- Suppose it gives and (each a constant times the same angle).
- Then — the cancels, so it is simply the ratio of the angle-multiples.
This works because both and become linear in after the collapse; the derivative of a constant-times- is just that constant.
Ratio of angle-multiples
- a, bthe constant multiples after each function collapses to a multiple of
- cancels in the ratio — never appears in the final answer
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q141 · May Shift 1 · 2021]
Don't differentiate w.r.t. separately and then divide blindly
Both functions must share ONE angle
Concept 6 of 6
Exponentials of Inverse-Trig Functions
Intuition
Definition
For with an inverse-trig function:
- , so the logarithmic-derivative ratio is .
- For : . For : .
- A related monotonicity shape: has for all , so it is strictly increasing, and , so it is odd.
Logarithmic-derivative ratio
- g(x)the inner inverse-trig exponent (e.g. )
- h'/hthe exponential cancels, leaving just
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q117 · 10th May Shift 1 · 2024]
strips the exponential — don't carry it
The sign comes from the inner inverse-trig
For monotonicity, check the SIGN of , not its messiness
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (6)
- Derivative of an Inverse Function
Derivative of an inverse function
- The Inverse Trigonometric Derivative Table
Chain rule on an inverse-trig function
- Collapsing Inverse-Trig with a Substitution
The two workhorse collapses
- tan inverse Addition and Complementary Identities
Arctan addition + complementary pair
- Differentiating One Inverse-Trig with Respect to Another
Ratio of angle-multiples
- Exponentials of Inverse-Trig Functions
Logarithmic-derivative ratio
Watch out for (15)
- Evaluate at , never at→ Derivative of an Inverse Function
- You rarely need the formula for→ Derivative of an Inverse Function
- Don't forget the inner derivative→ The Inverse Trigonometric Derivative Table
- The minus sign rides on the 'co' functions→ The Inverse Trigonometric Derivative Table
- and derivatives carry→ The Inverse Trigonometric Derivative Table
- Match the substitution to the argument's shape→ Collapsing Inverse-Trig with a Substitution
- Watch the principal-value branch→ Collapsing Inverse-Trig with a Substitution
- Exponential/log inner functions hide the same shapes→ Collapsing Inverse-Trig with a Substitution
- The constant differentiates to zero — but only if you SEE it→ tan inverse Addition and Complementary Identities
- Mind the sign and the validity range→ tan inverse Addition and Complementary Identities
- Don't differentiate w.r.t. separately and then divide blindly→ Differentiating One Inverse-Trig with Respect to Another
- Both functions must share ONE angle→ Differentiating One Inverse-Trig with Respect to Another
- strips the exponential — don't carry it→ Exponentials of Inverse-Trig Functions
- The sign comes from the inner inverse-trig→ Exponentials of Inverse-Trig Functions
- For monotonicity, check the SIGN of , not its messiness→ Exponentials of Inverse-Trig Functions
Drill every past-year question on this subtopic
39 questions from the bank — paginated, with cart and Word-export support.