MHT-CET Maths · Differentiation
Logarithmic Differentiation — Logs, Powers, and Long Products
When a function is a product, a quotient, or has a variable in the exponent, take the natural log of both sides FIRST — logs turn products into sums and pull exponents down front, so the differentiation becomes routine.
Why this matters
This is the most mechanical high-yield method in the chapter — 32 PYQs sit here, 11 HARD, 19 MODERATE and 2 EASY, yet almost every one follows the SAME three steps. Two shapes dominate the exam: a variable raised to a variable power like (sin x) to the tan x, and a long product (x+1)(2x+1)…(nx+1) whose derivative is asked at x = 0. Master the three steps — take log, differentiate (1/y)·y′, multiply back by y — and most of these become one-minute questions.
Concept 1 of 5: Logarithmic Differentiation — the Method
Definition
The three-step method for :
- Take logs: write and simplify using log laws (, ).
- Differentiate both sides: the left becomes (chain rule), the right is now a sum.
- Multiply back by : .
The headline result is the variable-base, variable-exponent rule below — both the "treat the exponent as constant" term and the "treat the base as constant" term appear and ADD.
Derivative of f(x) raised to g(x)
- the term from differentiating the exponent (treat base as constant)
- g(x)\,f'(x)/f(x)the term from differentiating the base (treat exponent as constant)
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 1 · Differentiation · Logarithmic Differentiation
Both terms appear — never use just one
A variable in the exponent kills the power rule
cos⁻¹(sin θ) collapses before you differentiate
Concept 2 of 5: Products, Quotients and Powers via Logs
Definition
After , use the three log laws to split:
- Product sum: .
- Quotient difference: .
- Power coefficient: (so a fractional exponent becomes a coefficient ).
Each resulting differentiates to ; then multiply the whole sum by . If the function is already wrapped in a log (), you do NOT have a hidden — just expand the inside with log laws and differentiate the sum directly.
Log of a power-product
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Differentiation · Logarithmic Differentiation
If y is already a log, there is no 1/y
Simplify before you differentiate —
A fractional exponent becomes a fractional COEFFICIENT
Concept 3 of 5: The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
Definition
For :
- Take logs: .
- Differentiate: .
- Evaluate at : every so and .
The leftover sum is a standard power-sum (carried in the formula box). If the -th factor is instead, you get . If the product runs and you evaluate at , only the vanishing factor's term survives — handle that by factoring it out, not by the sum.
Power sums (the leftover at x=0)
- pthe outer power (e.g. , , , or ) — it just multiplies the sum
- kthe coefficient of in the -th factor; squared factors give
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Differentiation · Logarithmic Differentiation
Substitute x=0 only AFTER differentiating
Squared factor , not
Product like (1-x)(2-x)⋯(n-x) at x=1 — factor, don't sum
The outer power just multiplies the sum
Concept 4 of 5: Change of Base and log-of-a-log Forms
Definition
Change of base: (any common base; use natural ). This converts a variable-base logarithm into a QUOTIENT of two natural logs, after which differentiate by the quotient rule. Nested form: ; differentiate this quotient, then evaluate. Many of these are asked at a clean point (, ) where one of the two log terms vanishes, killing half the quotient-rule expression.
Change of base
- natural log (base ) throughout this chapter
- athe base — when it depends on , this is why you must convert
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 4 · Differentiation · Logarithmic Differentiation
Convert the variable base BEFORE differentiating
A vanishing log term kills half the quotient rule
log of a log is NOT (log)²
Concept 5 of 5: Square-Root Quotients with Inverse-Trig Arguments
Definition
For where (e.g. ):
- Take logs and use the square root : .
- Differentiate: .
- Multiply back by and evaluate at the given point.
When asked at , note , so , , and at — the whole expression collapses to a single clean number.
Log of a square-root quotient
- uthe inner function, e.g. , with
- 1/2the coefficient produced by the outer square root
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 5 · Differentiation · Logarithmic Differentiation
Don't forget the chain factor u' on the inverse-trig inner
Compute y at the point — usually y=1 at x=0
Watch which factor is on top — it sets the sign
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (5)
- Logarithmic Differentiation — the Method
Derivative of f(x) raised to g(x)
- Products, Quotients and Powers via Logs
Log of a power-product
- The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
Power sums (the leftover at x=0)
- Change of Base and log-of-a-log Forms
Change of base
- Square-Root Quotients with Inverse-Trig Arguments
Log of a square-root quotient
Watch out for (16)
- Both terms appear — never use just one→ Logarithmic Differentiation — the Method
- A variable in the exponent kills the power rule→ Logarithmic Differentiation — the Method
- cos⁻¹(sin θ) collapses before you differentiate→ Logarithmic Differentiation — the Method
- If y is already a log, there is no 1/y→ Products, Quotients and Powers via Logs
- Simplify before you differentiate —→ Products, Quotients and Powers via Logs
- A fractional exponent becomes a fractional COEFFICIENT→ Products, Quotients and Powers via Logs
- Substitute x=0 only AFTER differentiating→ The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
- Squared factor , not→ The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
- Product like (1-x)(2-x)⋯(n-x) at x=1 — factor, don't sum→ The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
- The outer power just multiplies the sum→ The Product Chain [(x+1)(2x+1)⋯(nx+1)] Evaluated at x=0
- Convert the variable base BEFORE differentiating→ Change of Base and log-of-a-log Forms
- A vanishing log term kills half the quotient rule→ Change of Base and log-of-a-log Forms
- log of a log is NOT (log)²→ Change of Base and log-of-a-log Forms
- Don't forget the chain factor u' on the inverse-trig inner→ Square-Root Quotients with Inverse-Trig Arguments
- Compute y at the point — usually y=1 at x=0→ Square-Root Quotients with Inverse-Trig Arguments
- Watch which factor is on top — it sets the sign→ Square-Root Quotients with Inverse-Trig Arguments
Test yourself on Differentiation
20 past MHT-CET questions from this chapter, timed at 36 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.