MHT-CET Maths · Probability Distribution
Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
Restrict the sample space to compute P(A|B), chain events with the multiplication rule, exploit independence for 'at least one / exactly one' shortcuts, and reverse the conditioning with total probability and Bayes' theorem.
Why this matters
This is the densest subtopic in the chapter: 23 PYQs sit here (4 HARD, 15 MODERATE, 4 EASY). MHT-CET tests the whole conditional-probability chain — the definition P(A|B) = P(A∩B)/P(B), sequential draws without replacement, the independence identity P(A∩B) = P(A)P(B), the 1 − P(none) shortcut for 'the target is hit / the problem is solved', and Bayes' theorem for bag/box/disease posteriors. The recurring traps are all here too: confusing 'exactly one' with 'at least one', forgetting P(A'|B) = P(A') only when A and B are independent, and swapping priors with likelihoods in the Bayes ratio.
Concept 1 of 7
Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
Intuition
Definition
For events A and B with , the conditional probability of A given B is
- — the share of B's probability that also lies in A.
- Equivalently, rearranged, — the multiplication rule.
- When outcomes are equally likely, this reduces to counting: .
Definition of conditional probability
- probability that both A and B occur
- P(B)probability of the conditioning (given) event — the new universe
- probability of A once B is known to have occurred
Diagram · P(A | B) restricts the world to B
Once B is given, only the amber region counts — it's the new whole. P(A | B) is the slice of B that also lies in A: P(A | B) = P(A∩B) / P(B). Dividing by P(B) is exactly "rescale B to be the new 100%".
Worked example
P(A|B) and P(B|A) are not the same number
Divide by the GIVEN event's probability, not by 1
Concept 2 of 7
Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
Intuition
Definition
The general multiplication rule for a chain of events:
- .
- Without replacement: after each draw the counts shrink, so denominators drop by 1 and the relevant numerator drops by 1 as well. Drawing tickets one at a time is exactly this.
- One item from each of several independent sources: the joint probability is just the product of each source's single-draw probability; add over all the ways a target composition can occur.
Chain rule for a sequence of dependent draws
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q143 · 22 April Shift II · 2025]
Without replacement: shrink BOTH the numerator and the denominator
Add over all favourable orderings for a composition
'Alternately O,E,O OR E,O,E' means add both patterns
Concept 3 of 7
Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
Intuition
Definition
Apply to composite events:
- Distribution table: is the sum of the P(X) values in the numerator range that also satisfy , divided by .
- 'At least one' condition: for family/coin problems, , and 'at least one' is best found as .
- Counting-based: — list the outcomes in B, then count how many also lie in A.
Restriction form for composite conditioning
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q120 · 20 April Shift I · 2025]
The overlap A∩B is measured inside B, not over the whole space
Compute 'at least one' as the complement
Watch for a 'None of these' answer when your value is not listed
Concept 4 of 7
Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
Intuition
Definition
The independence identity and its consequences:
- (definition); then .
- If A, B are independent, so are the pairs , , ; hence and .
- Odds: 'odds in favour ' means ; 'odds against ' means .
- The complement-conditional sum , using .
Independence and the union it produces
- P(A)P(B)the product form — holds ONLY for independent A, B
- equals P(A') when A, B are independent
Diagram · mutually exclusive ≠ independent
Mutually exclusive events can't both happen, so they don't overlap and P(A∩B) = 0. Independent events do overlap — one happening doesn't change the other, so P(A∩B) = P(A)·P(B). Disjoint events with non-zero probability are therefore never independent.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 5 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Shift || · 2025]
P(A'|B) = P(A') needs INDEPENDENCE
The union formula loses its cross-term only when independent
Convert odds to probability before plugging in
Independent is not the same as mutually exclusive
Concept 5 of 7
At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
Intuition
Definition
For independent events with success probabilities :
- At least one succeeds: — one minus 'all fail'.
- Exactly one (of two): .
- A composite pattern like 'hit by P or Q but not R' is a sum of the independent triple-products matching that description, e.g. (all with R failing).
At-least-one and exactly-one
Diagram · two coin tosses → 2² = 4 outcomes
Each toss branches into H or T with probability ½, and the branches multiply: every leaf is ½ × ½ = ¼. Tossing n coins gives 2ⁿ equally likely outcomes — so "at least one head" is easiest via the complement, 1 − P(all tails).
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q142 · 9th May Shift 2 · 2024]
'At least one' is 1 − P(none), NOT the sum of individual probabilities
Exactly one ≠ at least one
Complement each event correctly inside a composite pattern
Concept 6 of 7
Total Probability Theorem
Intuition
Definition
If are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (they partition the sample space) with , then for any event E:
- .
- Each term is one route's prior times its conditional; the routes' priors sum to 1.
- Polya-urn / draw-then-add problems fit here: the first draw's colour defines the partition, and the second-draw probability is conditional on the updated bag.
Total probability theorem
- H_ithe partition (mutually exclusive, exhaustive routes)
- P(H_i)prior probability of route i
- probability of E along route i
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q119 · 2nd May Shift 1 · 2023]
The routes must partition the space — exclusive AND exhaustive
In draw-then-add problems, update the bag before the conditional
Concept 7 of 7
Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Intuition
Definition
For a partition and observed event E with :
- .
- Numerator = the chosen route's prior × likelihood; denominator = total probability of E (the sum of ALL routes' prior × likelihood).
- With equal priors , the priors cancel and the posterior is just — a ratio of likelihoods.
Bayes' theorem (posterior from priors and likelihoods)
- P(H_k)prior — probability of cause k before the evidence
- likelihood — how well cause k predicts the evidence E
- posterior — probability of cause k after seeing E
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q144 · 20 April Shift II · 2025]
Numerator is ONE route; denominator is ALL routes
Do not swap priors and likelihoods
Equal priors cancel — reduce to a likelihood ratio
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (7)
- Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
Definition of conditional probability
- Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
Chain rule for a sequence of dependent draws
- Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
Restriction form for composite conditioning
- Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
Independence and the union it produces
- At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
At-least-one and exactly-one
- Total Probability Theorem
Total probability theorem
- Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Bayes' theorem (posterior from priors and likelihoods)
Watch out for (20)
- P(A|B) and P(B|A) are not the same number→ Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
- Divide by the GIVEN event's probability, not by 1→ Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
- Without replacement: shrink BOTH the numerator and the denominator→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- Add over all favourable orderings for a composition→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- 'Alternately O,E,O OR E,O,E' means add both patterns→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- The overlap A∩B is measured inside B, not over the whole space→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- Compute 'at least one' as the complement→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- Watch for a 'None of these' answer when your value is not listed→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- P(A'|B) = P(A') needs INDEPENDENCE→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- The union formula loses its cross-term only when independent→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- Convert odds to probability before plugging in→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- Independent is not the same as mutually exclusive→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- 'At least one' is 1 − P(none), NOT the sum of individual probabilities→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- Exactly one ≠ at least one→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- Complement each event correctly inside a composite pattern→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- The routes must partition the space — exclusive AND exhaustive→ Total Probability Theorem
- In draw-then-add problems, update the bag before the conditional→ Total Probability Theorem
- Numerator is ONE route; denominator is ALL routes→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
- Do not swap priors and likelihoods→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
- Equal priors cancel — reduce to a likelihood ratio→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Drill every past-year question on this subtopic
26 questions from the bank — paginated, with cart and Word-export support.