MHT-CET Maths · Probability Distribution
Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
Restrict the sample space to compute P(A|B), chain events with the multiplication rule, exploit independence for 'at least one / exactly one' shortcuts, and reverse the conditioning with total probability and Bayes' theorem.
Why this matters
24 PYQs sit here (8 HARD, 13 MODERATE, 3 EASY), and at 33% HARD it is the chapter's toughest block. MHT-CET tests the whole conditional-probability chain — the definition P(A|B) = P(A∩B)/P(B), sequential draws without replacement, the independence identity P(A∩B) = P(A)P(B), the 1 − P(none) shortcut for 'the target is hit / the problem is solved', and Bayes' theorem for bag/box/disease posteriors. The recurring traps are all here too: confusing 'exactly one' with 'at least one', forgetting P(A'|B) = P(A') only when A and B are independent, and swapping priors with likelihoods in the Bayes ratio.
Concept 1 of 7: Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
Definition
For events A and B with , the conditional probability of A given B is
- — the share of B's probability that also lies in A.
- Equivalently, rearranged, — the multiplication rule.
- When outcomes are equally likely, this reduces to counting: .
Definition of conditional probability
- probability that both A and B occur
- P(B)probability of the conditioning (given) event — the new universe
- probability of A once B is known to have occurred
Diagram · P(A | B) restricts the world to B
Once B is given, only the amber region counts — it's the new whole. P(A | B) is the slice of B that also lies in A: P(A | B) = P(A∩B) / P(B). Dividing by P(B) is exactly "rescale B to be the new 100%".
Worked example
P(A|B) and P(B|A) are not the same number
Divide by the GIVEN event's probability, not by 1
Concept 2 of 7: Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
Definition
The general multiplication rule for a chain of events:
- .
- Without replacement: after each draw the counts shrink, so denominators drop by 1 and the relevant numerator drops by 1 as well. Drawing tickets one at a time is exactly this.
- One item from each of several independent sources: the joint probability is just the product of each source's single-draw probability; add over all the ways a target composition can occur.
Chain rule for a sequence of dependent draws
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
Without replacement: shrink BOTH the numerator and the denominator
Add over all favourable orderings for a composition
'Alternately O,E,O OR E,O,E' means add both patterns
Concept 3 of 7: Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
Definition
Apply to composite events:
- Distribution table: is the sum of the P(X) values in the numerator range that also satisfy , divided by .
- 'At least one' condition: for family/coin problems, , and 'at least one' is best found as .
- Counting-based: — list the outcomes in B, then count how many also lie in A.
Restriction form for composite conditioning
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The overlap A∩B is measured inside B, not over the whole space
Compute 'at least one' as the complement
Watch for a 'None of these' answer when your value is not listed
Concept 4 of 7: Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
Definition
The independence identity and its consequences:
- (definition); then .
- If A, B are independent, so are the pairs , , ; hence and .
- Odds: 'odds in favour ' means ; 'odds against ' means .
- The complement-conditional sum , using .
Independence and the union it produces
- P(A)P(B)the product form — holds ONLY for independent A, B
- equals P(A') when A, B are independent
Diagram · mutually exclusive ≠ independent
Mutually exclusive events can't both happen, so they don't overlap and P(A∩B) = 0. Independent events do overlap — one happening doesn't change the other, so P(A∩B) = P(A)·P(B). Disjoint events with non-zero probability are therefore never independent.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 5 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 4 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
P(A'|B) = P(A') needs INDEPENDENCE
The union formula loses its cross-term only when independent
Convert odds to probability before plugging in
Independent is not the same as mutually exclusive
Concept 5 of 7: At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
Definition
For independent events with success probabilities :
- At least one succeeds: — one minus 'all fail'.
- Exactly one (of two): .
- A composite pattern like 'hit by P or Q but not R' is a sum of the independent triple-products matching that description, e.g. (all with R failing).
At-least-one and exactly-one
Diagram · two coin tosses → 2² = 4 outcomes
Each toss branches into H or T with probability ½, and the branches multiply: every leaf is ½ × ½ = ¼. Tossing n coins gives 2ⁿ equally likely outcomes — so "at least one head" is easiest via the complement, 1 − P(all tails).
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 5 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
'At least one' is 1 − P(none), NOT the sum of individual probabilities
Exactly one ≠ at least one
Complement each event correctly inside a composite pattern
Concept 6 of 7: Total Probability Theorem
Definition
If are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (they partition the sample space) with , then for any event E:
- .
- Each term is one route's prior times its conditional; the routes' priors sum to 1.
- Polya-urn / draw-then-add problems fit here: the first draw's colour defines the partition, and the second-draw probability is conditional on the updated bag.
Total probability theorem
- H_ithe partition (mutually exclusive, exhaustive routes)
- P(H_i)prior probability of route i
- probability of E along route i
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 6 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
The routes must partition the space — exclusive AND exhaustive
In draw-then-add problems, update the bag before the conditional
Concept 7 of 7: Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Definition
For a partition and observed event E with :
- .
- Numerator = the chosen route's prior × likelihood; denominator = total probability of E (the sum of ALL routes' prior × likelihood).
- With equal priors , the priors cancel and the posterior is just — a ratio of likelihoods.
Bayes' theorem (posterior from priors and likelihoods)
- P(H_k)prior — probability of cause k before the evidence
- likelihood — how well cause k predicts the evidence E
- posterior — probability of cause k after seeing E
Visualization · total probability & Bayes tree
Each leaf is a route product P(Bᵢ)·P(A|Bᵢ). Total probability adds the two leaves that end in A; Bayes' theorem divides one of those leaves by that total to flip the conditioning.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 7 · Probability Distribution · Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes' Theorem
Numerator is ONE route; denominator is ALL routes
Do not swap priors and likelihoods
Equal priors cancel — reduce to a likelihood ratio
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (7)
- Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
Definition of conditional probability
- Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
Chain rule for a sequence of dependent draws
- Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
Restriction form for composite conditioning
- Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
Independence and the union it produces
- At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
At-least-one and exactly-one
- Total Probability Theorem
Total probability theorem
- Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Bayes' theorem (posterior from priors and likelihoods)
Watch out for (20)
- P(A|B) and P(B|A) are not the same number→ Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
- Divide by the GIVEN event's probability, not by 1→ Conditional Probability — Restricting the Sample Space
- Without replacement: shrink BOTH the numerator and the denominator→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- Add over all favourable orderings for a composition→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- 'Alternately O,E,O OR E,O,E' means add both patterns→ Multiplication Rule and Sequential Draws Without Replacement
- The overlap A∩B is measured inside B, not over the whole space→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- Compute 'at least one' as the complement→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- Watch for a 'None of these' answer when your value is not listed→ Computing P(A|B) by Restriction — Distributions, Counting and Composite Events
- P(A'|B) = P(A') needs INDEPENDENCE→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- The union formula loses its cross-term only when independent→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- Convert odds to probability before plugging in→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- Independent is not the same as mutually exclusive→ Independence and Event Algebra with Unions
- 'At least one' is 1 − P(none), NOT the sum of individual probabilities→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- Exactly one ≠ at least one→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- Complement each event correctly inside a composite pattern→ At Least One and Exactly One for Independent Trials
- The routes must partition the space — exclusive AND exhaustive→ Total Probability Theorem
- In draw-then-add problems, update the bag before the conditional→ Total Probability Theorem
- Numerator is ONE route; denominator is ALL routes→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
- Do not swap priors and likelihoods→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
- Equal priors cancel — reduce to a likelihood ratio→ Bayes' Theorem — Reversing the Conditioning
Test yourself on Probability Distribution
20 past MHT-CET questions from this chapter, timed at 36 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.