NDA Maths · Vectors
Dot Product and Angle
The scalar that captures how aligned two vectors are — used to compute angles, test perpendicularity, and evaluate work done by a force.
Why this matters
The dot product turns two vectors into a single number — and that number contains everything you'd ever want to know about how the two vectors RELATE. Are they perpendicular? At what angle do they meet? How aligned are they with each other? The five concepts below build that toolkit: starting with the formula itself (and its physical meaning as work done by a force, W = F · d), through the perpendicularity test and the angle formula, ending with the most-tested setup — "given a constraint on two vectors a and b, find the angle between them." 32 PYQs across 2017–2026 — the second-biggest Vectors subtopic; almost every paper has one — with a difficulty mix of 12 EASY + 16 MODERATE + 4 HARD.
Concept 1 of 5
Dot product — components form and work done
Intuition
Definition
If and , then . It is commutative, distributive over addition, and a scalar (not a vector). Work done by a constant force is where is the displacement.
Dot product (components form)
- components of along
- work done by a constant force through displacement
Diagram · work = F · d = |F||d| cos θ
Only the part of the force along the displacement does work: W = F · d = |F||d| cos θ. A force perpendicular to the motion (θ = 90°) does zero work; one opposing it (θ > 90°) does negative work.
Worked example
- Compute the displacement: .
- Apply .
- Sum: .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.for , ?
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.for , ?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q47 · Sep · 2017]
Dot product gives a scalar; cross product gives a vector
Work done is signed — negative work is fine
Concept 2 of 5
Perpendicularity Test
Intuition
Definition
For non-zero , all three of the following are equivalent: ; ; . Each says .
Equivalent perpendicularity statements
- scalar dot product
- magnitudes of the diagonals of the parallelogram on
Worked example
- Apply the perpendicularity test .
- Compute the dot: .
- Set equal to zero: .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.Are and perpendicular?
- 2.for , perpendicular?
- 3.Perpendicularity condition for ?
- 4.Are and perpendicular?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q70 · Apr · 2019]
means , not
Zero dot product needs both vectors non-zero
Concept 3 of 5
Angle between two vectors via the dot-product formula
Intuition
Definition
For non-zero at angle (): , hence . Useful corollary: when are unit vectors.
Angle from dot product
- angle between and , measured in
- dot product (scalar)
- magnitudes (always positive)
Visualization · project a onto b
The green band is how far a reaches along b — its signed length is the scalar projection (a·b)/|b|. Push the angle past 90° and the dot product, and the projection, turn negative.
Worked example
- Dot product: .
- Magnitudes: ; .
- Apply the formula: .
- Hence .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.Angle between and ?
- 2.for , , ?
- 3.Angle between and ?
- 4.If , the angle is?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q95 · Sep · 2023]
Obtuse angle iff
Direction matters when comparing two angles
Concept 4 of 5
Solving for an angle from a perpendicularity / magnitude constraint
Intuition
Definition
Given a perpendicularity constraint , expand using distributivity: . Substitute known magnitudes and isolate , then plug into the angle formula.
Expansion template
- given scalar coefficients
- given (often for unit vectors)
- unknown — solve for it, then read off
Worked example
- Set .
- Expand: (using ).
- Set equal to zero: .
- Unit vectors with : , so .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.Expand .
- 2.Unit : write in terms of .
- 3.Unit with . Find .
- 4.For a unit vector,
From the bank · past-year question
[Q67 · Sep · 2022]
Don't forget the cross terms when expanding
Unit vectors mean , not
Concept 5 of 5
Unit vectors, orthogonal triples, and decomposition
Intuition
Definition
Vectors form an orthonormal triple if and . If with orthonormal, the coefficients drop out as , , .
Orthonormal-triple identities
- three mutually-perpendicular unit vectors
- decomposition coefficients along
Diagram · orthonormal triple î, ĵ, k̂ (drag to rotate)
î, ĵ, k̂ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors: each pair has dot product 0 (î·ĵ = ĵ·k̂ = k̂·î = 0) and each has length 1. They form the standard basis — any vector is a unique combination x î + y ĵ + z k̂.
Worked example
- Expand the square: .
- Self-dots: . All pairwise products vanish by mutual perpendicularity.
- So , giving .
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
Try it yourself
Practice — Level 1 (4 reps)
Quick reps to lock in the method. Try each, then check.
- 1.mutually perpendicular unit vectors. ?
- 2.Perpendicular unit : ?
- 3.Orthonormal triple:
- 4.Perpendicular unit : ?
From the bank · past-year question
[Q67 · Sep · 2018]
Three unit vectors at equal pairwise angles need not be orthonormal
is orthonormal iff and both unit
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (5)
- Dot product — components form and work done
Dot product (components form)
- Perpendicularity Test
Equivalent perpendicularity statements
- Angle between two vectors via the dot-product formula
Angle from dot product
- Solving for an angle from a perpendicularity / magnitude constraint
Expansion template
- Unit vectors, orthogonal triples, and decomposition
Orthonormal-triple identities
Watch out for (10)
- Dot product gives a scalar; cross product gives a vector→ Dot product — components form and work done
- Work done is signed — negative work is fine→ Dot product — components form and work done
- means , not→ Perpendicularity Test
- Zero dot product needs both vectors non-zero→ Perpendicularity Test
- Obtuse angle iff→ Angle between two vectors via the dot-product formula
- Direction matters when comparing two angles→ Angle between two vectors via the dot-product formula
- Don't forget the cross terms when expanding→ Solving for an angle from a perpendicularity / magnitude constraint
- Unit vectors mean , not→ Solving for an angle from a perpendicularity / magnitude constraint
- Three unit vectors at equal pairwise angles need not be orthonormal→ Unit vectors, orthogonal triples, and decomposition
- is orthonormal iff and both unit→ Unit vectors, orthogonal triples, and decomposition
Mastery check — 5 interleaved questions
Try each one before clicking. Questions are interleaved across the concepts above, not grouped — interleaving sharpens transfer.
[Q64 · Sep · 2018]
[Q70 · Apr · 2017]
[Q52 · Sep · 2024]
[Q53 · Sep · 2024]
[Q69 · Apr · 2026]
Drill every past-year question on this subtopic
32 questions from the bank — paginated, with cart and Word-export support.