PYQ Vault

JEE Mains Maths · Formula sheet

Matrices formulas

27 formulas and 33 common traps for JEE Mains Maths Matrices, grouped by subtopic.

Full notes with worked examples

Matrix Algebra, Types & Operations

Learn this subtopic in the notes

Order, equality, linear combinations, and trace

Trace (sum of the diagonal)

tr⁡(A)=∑i=1naii\operatorname{tr}(A)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{ii}

Matrix multiplication: conformability and the row-by-column rule

Row-by-column entry rule

(AB)ij=∑kaik bkj(AB)_{ij}=\sum_{k} a_{ik}\,b_{kj}

Transpose and the reversal law

Transpose rules

(AB)T=BTAT(AT)T=A(AB)^{T}=B^{T}A^{T}\qquad (A^{T})^{T}=A

Non-commutativity, zero divisors, and commuting matrices

Non-commutative square expansion

(A+B)2=A2+AB+BA+B2(A+B)^{2}=A^{2}+AB+BA+B^{2}

Elementary row operations

The three operations

Ri↔RjRi→kRi (k≠0)Ri→Ri+kRjR_i\leftrightarrow R_j\qquad R_i\to kR_i\ (k\neq0)\qquad R_i\to R_i+kR_j

Counting matrices

Counting bridges

#=kmntr⁡(ATA)=∑i,jaij2\#=k^{mn}\qquad \operatorname{tr}(A^{T}A)=\sum_{i,j}a_{ij}^{2}

Common traps

Trace is the DIAGONAL sum, not the sum of all entries

tr⁡(A)\operatorname{tr}(A) adds only a11,a22,…,anna_{11},a_{22},\dots,a_{nn} — the main diagonal. Students who total every entry of the matrix get the wrong number. Only the diagonal counts, and only square matrices have a trace at all.

Matrix multiplication is NOT commutative — AB≠BAAB\neq BA

Order matters: ABAB and BABA are generally different matrices, and one may be undefined while the other exists. Never swap factors inside a product. If a question defines ABAB, compute ABAB — reaching for BABA is the classic slip.

(AB)T=BTAT(AB)^{T}=B^{T}A^{T} — the order REVERSES

The transpose of a product flips the factors: (AB)T=BTAT(AB)^{T}=B^{T}A^{T}, never ATBTA^{T}B^{T}. Sum and scalar transposes keep their order, so only the PRODUCT reverses. Writing ATBTA^{T}B^{T} is the trap answer.

AB=OAB=O does NOT force A=OA=O or B=OB=O

Unlike numbers, matrices have zero divisors: two nonzero matrices can multiply to OO (e.g. (1000)(0001)=O\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}=O). You may not 'cancel' a matrix. When A,BA,B are nonzero with AB=OAB=O, the correct conclusion is that both are singular (det⁡=0\det=0).

Don't import a2−b2=(a+b)(a−b)a^{2}-b^{2}=(a+b)(a-b) into matrices

Every number identity that secretly uses commutativity can fail for matrices: (A+B)(A−B)(A+B)(A-B), (A+B)2(A+B)^{2}, and (AB)2=A2B2(AB)^{2}=A^{2}B^{2} all break unless AB=BAAB=BA. An option that quietly assumes one of these is almost always the trap.

Powers of a Matrix & the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem

Learn this subtopic in the notes

Cyclic and pattern powers

Cyclic reduction

Ad=I ⇒ An=A n mod dA^d = I \ \Rightarrow\ A^n = A^{\,n \bmod d}

Nilpotent shift: A = I + N

Binomial for a nilpotent shift

A=I+N, Nk=O ⇒ An=I+nN+(n2)N2+…A = I + N,\ N^k = O \ \Rightarrow\ A^n = I + nN + \binom{n}{2}N^2 + \dots
  • NNnilpotent part A − I (strictly triangular)
  • (n2)\binom{n}{2}n(n−1)/2, the coefficient of N²

Idempotent (A² = A) and involutory (A² = I) matrices

Idempotent binomial collapse

A2=A ⇒ (I+A)n=I+(2n−1)AA^2 = A \ \Rightarrow\ (I+A)^n = I + (2^n - 1)A

The Cayley-Hamilton equation

Cayley-Hamilton (2×2)

A2−(tr⁡A) A+(det⁡A) I=OA^2 - (\operatorname{tr}A)\,A + (\det A)\,I = O
  • tr⁡A\operatorname{tr}Aa + d, sum of diagonal entries
  • det⁡A\det Aad − bc

Reducing higher powers with a polynomial relation

Power reduction

A2=pA+qI ⇒ A3=(p2+q)A+pq IA^2 = pA + qI \ \Rightarrow\ A^3 = (p^2+q)A + pq\,I

Sums of powers of a matrix

Geometric sum for a rank-1 matrix

A2=cA ⇒ ∑k=1mAk=cm−1c−1 AA^2 = cA \ \Rightarrow\ \sum_{k=1}^{m}A^k = \frac{c^m - 1}{c - 1}\,A

Powers under conjugation: (P⁻¹BP)ⁿ

Conjugation commutes with powers

(P−1BP)n=P−1BnP(PTP=I⇒PT(PBPT)nP=Bn)(P^{-1}BP)^n = P^{-1}B^{n}P \qquad (P^{T}P = I \Rightarrow P^{T}(PBP^{T})^{n}P = B^{n})

Counting n with Aⁿ = A or Aⁿ = I

Counting the exponents

An=I  ⟺  d∣n ⇒ #{n≤N}=⌊Nd⌋A^n = I \iff d \mid n \ \Rightarrow\ \#\{n \le N\} = \left\lfloor \tfrac{N}{d} \right\rfloor

Eigenvalue and trace-determinant reasoning

Sum and product of eigenvalues

λ1+λ2=tr⁡A,λ1λ2=det⁡A\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 = \operatorname{tr}A,\qquad \lambda_1\lambda_2 = \det A

Common traps

Reduce the exponent modulo the period FIRST

Once you find Ad=IA^d = I, a power like A2019A^{2019} is just A 2019 mod dA^{\,2019 \bmod d}. Students who start multiplying A⋅A⋅A…A\cdot A\cdot A\dots never finish. Find the period, take the remainder, done.

The binomial TRUNCATES — don't chase infinitely many terms

For A=I+NA = I + N, the expansion of AnA^n stops at the last non-zero NkN^k. A 3×33\times3 unitriangular matrix has N3=ON^3 = O, so you need exactly three terms — no more. Writing an endless series is wasted effort.

This is not a normal binomial — II and NN must commute

(I+N)n=∑(nk)Nk(I+N)^n = \sum \binom{n}{k}N^k is valid ONLY because II commutes with NN. You may never apply the binomial theorem to (A+B)n(A+B)^n for two general matrices; here it works purely because one summand is II.

(I+A)n=I+(2n−1)A(I+A)^n = I + (2^n-1)A needs A2=AA^2 = A

This clean collapse holds ONLY for an idempotent AA. If A2≠AA^2 \ne A, the binomial doesn't fold up — you must use the actual structure (nilpotent, cyclic, or Cayley-Hamilton). Always verify A2=AA^2 = A before you use it.

The determinant term is +det⁡A+\det A for a 2×22\times2

Cayley-Hamilton is A2−(tr⁡A)A+(det⁡A)I=OA^2 - (\operatorname{tr}A)A + (\det A)I = O: the trace term is negative, the determinant term is positive. Flipping the sign of det⁡A\det A is the single most common slip — read the constant term off directly as +det⁡A+\det A.

Cayley-Hamilton is about the CHARACTERISTIC polynomial

The matrix satisfies p(A)=Op(A) = O where p(λ)=det⁡(A−λI)p(\lambda) = \det(A - \lambda I) — not some arbitrary polynomial you'd like. For 3×33\times3 the coefficients are tr⁡A\operatorname{tr}A, the sum of principal 2×22\times2 minors, and det⁡A\det A.

Substitute the relation at every step — don't expand entrywise

When a problem hands you A2=pA+qIA^2 = pA + qI, you are meant to REDUCE powers algebraically, not compute the matrix. Re-apply the relation each time a fresh A2A^2 appears; the answer always lands as αA+βI\alpha A + \beta I.

Spot the rank-1 structure before you multiply

If a matrix is a column times a row (e.g. aij=2 j−i=2−i⋅2ja_{ij} = 2^{\,j-i} = 2^{-i}\cdot 2^{j}), then A2=(tr⁡A)AA^2 = (\operatorname{tr}A)A and every power is a scalar times AA. Recognising this turns a scary ∑Ak\sum A^k into a plain geometric series.

Strip the conjugation FIRST

(P−1BP)n(P^{-1}BP)^n is never expanded directly. The middle PP−1P P^{-1} pairs telescope, leaving P−1BnPP^{-1}B^{n}P. For orthogonal PP remember P−1=PTP^{-1} = P^{T}, so PT(PBPT)nPP^{T}(PBP^{T})^{n}P collapses all the way to BnB^{n}.

Find the PERIOD, then count residues — don't test each n

The whole question reduces to "how many n≤Nn \le N hit the right residue mod dd". Nail the period first (often the order of a complex eigenvalue like ii or ω\omega), and the rest is arithmetic. Testing powers one by one is a trap for time.

tr⁡(A2)≠(tr⁡A)2\operatorname{tr}(A^2) \ne (\operatorname{tr}A)^2

The sum of diagonal entries of A2A^2 is λ12+λ22=(tr⁡A)2−2det⁡A\lambda_1^2 + \lambda_2^2 = (\operatorname{tr}A)^2 - 2\det A, NOT (tr⁡A)2(\operatorname{tr}A)^2. Forgetting the −2det⁡A-2\det A correction is the standard error on these trace questions.

Symmetric, Skew-Symmetric and Orthogonal Matrices

Learn this subtopic in the notes

Definitions, entry patterns, and counting

Free-entry counts for order n

#{symmetric}=k n(n+1)/2,#{skew}={k n(n−1)/20∈value set00∉value set\#\{\text{symmetric}\} = k^{\,n(n+1)/2}, \qquad \#\{\text{skew}\} = \begin{cases} k^{\,n(n-1)/2} & 0 \in \text{value set}\\[2pt] 0 & 0 \notin \text{value set}\end{cases}
  • nnorder of the square matrix
  • kknumber of allowed values per entry

The symmetric-plus-skew decomposition

Unique symmetric + skew split

A=12(A+AT)⏟P symmetric+12(A−AT)⏟Q skewA = \underbrace{\tfrac12(A+A^T)}_{P\ \text{symmetric}} + \underbrace{\tfrac12(A-A^T)}_{Q\ \text{skew}}

Transposing products of symmetric and skew matrices

Transpose rules and skew-power parity

(XY)T=YTXT,(Bn)T=(−1)nBn  (B skew)(XY)^T = Y^T X^T, \qquad (B^n)^T = (-1)^n B^n \ \ (B\ \text{skew})

The quadratic form test for skew-symmetry

Quadratic-form characterisation

XTAX=0  ∀X  ⟹  AT=−A  (A skew-symmetric)X^TAX = 0 \ \ \forall X \;\Longrightarrow\; A^T = -A \ \ (A\ \text{skew-symmetric})

Orthogonal, rotation, and Cayley-transform matrices

Orthogonality and rotation composition

AAT=I  ⇒  A−1=AT, det⁡A=±1f(x)f(y)=f(x+y)AA^T=I \;\Rightarrow\; A^{-1}=A^T,\ \det A=\pm1 \qquad f(x)f(y)=f(x+y)

Common traps

A symmetric matrix is NOT determined by n2n^2 free choices

For a symmetric 3×33\times3 matrix you choose only 3⋅42=6\tfrac{3\cdot4}{2}=6 entries (3 diagonal + 3 upper), not 99. Counting all 99 entries freely over-counts massively — the lower triangle is a mirror, not a free choice.

Skew-symmetric over a set missing 00 gives ZERO matrices

The diagonal of a skew matrix is forced to 00. If the allowed value set does not contain 00 (e.g. {−3,−2,−1,1,2}\{-3,-2,-1,1,2\}), the skew count collapses to 00 — a favourite JEE curveball hidden inside a union count.

BnB^n flips type with the parity of nn

For skew BB, B26B^{26} is symmetric but B5B^{5} is skew. Students who assume every power of a skew matrix stays skew mis-answer questions like B5−A5B^{5}-A^{5}: since (B5)T=−B5(B^5)^T=-B^5 and (A5)T=A5(A^5)^T=A^5, the difference is neither symmetric nor skew in general.

A product of symmetric matrices need not be symmetric

(AB)T=BTAT=BA(AB)^T=B^TA^T=BA for symmetric A,BA,B — which equals ABAB only if they commute. Don't declare ABAB symmetric automatically; it is symmetric iff AB=BAAB=BA.

XTAX=0X^TAX=0 does not mean A=OA=O

The vanishing quadratic form only annihilates the symmetric part A+ATA+A^T. A non-zero skew matrix such as (02−20)\begin{pmatrix}0&2\\-2&0\end{pmatrix} satisfies XTAX=0X^TAX=0 identically while being far from the zero matrix. Read the condition as 'skew', not 'zero'.

det⁡A=±1\det A=\pm1, not always +1+1

Orthogonality only pins (det⁡A)2=1(\det A)^2=1. Proper rotations have det⁡=+1\det=+1, but reflections are orthogonal with det⁡=−1\det=-1. Never assume the determinant is 11 unless the matrix is specifically a rotation.

Orthogonal is about AT=A−1A^T=A^{-1}, not AT=AA^T=A

Don't confuse orthogonal (AAT=IAA^T=I, so AT=A−1A^T=A^{-1}) with symmetric (AT=AA^T=A). A symmetric matrix with A2=IA^2=I happens to be orthogonal too, but symmetry alone never implies orthogonality.

Adjoint, Inverse & Determinant Identities

Learn this subtopic in the notes

Determinant of products, transposes and scalar multiples

Determinant identities

det⁡(AB)=det⁡A det⁡B,det⁡(AT)=det⁡A,det⁡(kA)=k ndet⁡A\det(AB)=\det A\,\det B,\quad \det(A^T)=\det A,\quad \det(kA)=k^{\,n}\det A

Adjoint identities: A·adj A = |A|I and |adj A| = |A|ⁿ⁻¹

Adjoint identities

A(adj⁡A)=∣A∣ In,∣adj⁡A∣=∣A∣ n−1,adj⁡(kA)=k n−1adj⁡AA(\operatorname{adj}A) = |A|\,I_n, \qquad |\operatorname{adj}A| = |A|^{\,n-1}, \qquad \operatorname{adj}(kA) = k^{\,n-1}\operatorname{adj}A

Adjoint of the adjoint

Double adjoint

adj⁡(adj⁡A)=∣A∣ n−2A,∣adj⁡(adj⁡A)∣=∣A∣ (n−1)2\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A) = |A|^{\,n-2}A, \qquad |\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A)| = |A|^{\,(n-1)^2}

Inverse from the adjoint and PQ = kI

Inverse and PQ = kI

A−1=adj⁡A∣A∣ (∣A∣≠0),PQ=kIn⇒Q=kP−1,  ∣Q∣=k n∣P∣A^{-1} = \frac{\operatorname{adj}A}{|A|}\ (|A|\neq0), \qquad PQ = kI_n \Rightarrow Q = kP^{-1},\ \ |Q| = \frac{k^{\,n}}{|P|}

Inverse via Cayley–Hamilton (A⁻¹ = αA + βI)

2×2 inverse from Cayley–Hamilton

A2−(tr⁡A)A+(det⁡A)I=O ⇒ A−1=(tr⁡A)I−Adet⁡AA^{2} - (\operatorname{tr}A)A + (\det A)I = O \ \Rightarrow\ A^{-1} = \frac{(\operatorname{tr}A)I - A}{\det A}

When is a matrix invertible? (det ≠ 0)

Invertibility test

A−1 exists  ⟺  ∣A∣≠0andAB=I⇒BA=I (square matrices)A^{-1}\text{ exists} \iff |A| \neq 0 \qquad\text{and}\qquad AB = I \Rightarrow BA = I \ \text{(square matrices)}

Special inverses, counting, and the reversal law

Reversal law and self-inverse

(AB)−1=B−1A−1,A=A−1  ⟺  A2=I,det⁡(A+I)=det⁡A+tr⁡A+1 (2×2)(AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}, \qquad A = A^{-1} \iff A^{2} = I, \qquad \det(A + I) = \det A + \operatorname{tr}A + 1\ (2\times2)

Common traps

det⁡(kA)=k ndet⁡A\det(kA) = k^{\,n}\det A, NOT kdet⁡Ak\det A

Every scalar multiple of an n×nn\times n matrix multiplies the determinant by knk^n — one factor of kk per row. For a 3×33\times3 matrix, ∣2A∣=8∣A∣|2A| = 8|A|, not 2∣A∣2|A|. Forgetting the power nn is the single most common determinant slip.

∣adj⁡A∣=∣A∣ n−1|\operatorname{adj}A| = |A|^{\,n-1} — the exponent is n−1n-1, NOT nn

For a 3×33\times3 matrix, ∣adj⁡A∣=∣A∣2|\operatorname{adj}A| = |A|^2, not ∣A∣3|A|^3 and not ∣A∣|A|. Students who write ∣A∣3|A|^3 (over-counting) or ∣A∣|A| (dropping the power) walk into the two standard distractors.

adj⁡(kA)=k n−1adj⁡A\operatorname{adj}(kA) = k^{\,n-1}\operatorname{adj}A — note n−1n-1, not nn

The adjoint scales by kn−1k^{n-1}, one power LESS than the determinant's knk^n. For a 3×33\times3, adj⁡(2A)=4adj⁡A\operatorname{adj}(2A) = 4\operatorname{adj}A, not 8adj⁡A8\operatorname{adj}A. Mixing up which one loses the power of nn is the trap.

adj⁡(adj⁡A)=∣A∣ n−2A\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A) = |A|^{\,n-2}A: for 3×33\times3 it's ∣A∣⋅A|A|\cdot A, for 2×22\times2 it's just AA

The power on ∣A∣|A| is n−2n-2. For n=3n = 3 that is ∣A∣1|A|^1, so adj⁡(adj⁡A)=∣A∣A\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A) = |A|A; for n=2n = 2 it is ∣A∣0=1|A|^0 = 1, so adj⁡(adj⁡A)=A\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A) = A. Writing ∣A∣A|A|A for a 2×22\times2 is a classic over-application.

∣adj⁡(adj⁡A)∣=∣A∣4|\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}A)| = |A|^{4} for 3×33\times3, NOT ∣A∣2|A|^2

The determinant of the double adjoint carries the exponent (n−1)2(n-1)^2. For a 3×33\times3 that is (3−1)2=4(3-1)^2 = 4, giving ∣A∣4|A|^4. It is easy to stop at ∣A∣2|A|^2 (the single-adjoint power) or at ∣A∣n−2=∣A∣|A|^{n-2}=|A| (the matrix power) — both are wrong for the determinant.

PQ=kIn⇒∣Q∣=k n/∣P∣PQ = kI_n \Rightarrow |Q| = k^{\,n}/|P| — the knk^n, not kk

From Q=kP−1Q = kP^{-1}, taking determinants pulls the scalar out as knk^n (order nn), so ∣Q∣=kn∣P−1∣=kn/∣P∣|Q| = k^n|P^{-1}| = k^n/|P|. For a 3×33\times3, that is k3/∣P∣k^3/|P|. Writing k/∣P∣k/|P| forgets the knk^n rule and is the intended distractor.

Divide by det⁡A\det A — Cayley–Hamilton gives A−1A^{-1}, not adj⁡A\operatorname{adj}A

After multiplying A2−(tr⁡A)A+(det⁡A)I=OA^2 - (\operatorname{tr}A)A + (\det A)I = O by A−1A^{-1}, you get (det⁡A)A−1=(tr⁡A)I−A(\det A)A^{-1} = (\operatorname{tr}A)I - A. You MUST divide by det⁡A\det A to isolate A−1A^{-1}; stopping at (tr⁡A)I−A(\operatorname{tr}A)I - A gives adj⁡A\operatorname{adj}A (unnormalised), off by a factor of det⁡A\det A.

MN=OMN = O with NN invertible forces M=OM = O (so ∣M∣=0|M| = 0)

If a product is the zero matrix and one factor is invertible, the OTHER factor must be zero — multiply MN=OMN = O on the right by N−1N^{-1}. Questions like 'A2−B2A^2 - B^2 invertible, find det⁡(A3+B3)\det(A^3 + B^3)' collapse to A3+B3=OA^3 + B^3 = O, so the determinant is 00. Don't try to compute entries.

A=A−1A = A^{-1} means A2=IA^2 = I, NOT A=IA = I

Self-inverse (involutory) matrices are far more than just the identity — any matrix with A2=IA^2 = I qualifies, including −I-I, reflections, and many trace-zero 2×22\times2 matrices. A counting question 'A=A−1A = A^{-1}' asks for ALL solutions of A2=IA^2 = I, which can number in the dozens.

det⁡(A+I)=det⁡A+tr⁡A+1\det(A + I) = \det A + \operatorname{tr}A + 1 for 2×22\times2, NOT det⁡A+1\det A + 1

Adding II to a 2×22\times2 shifts the determinant by tr⁡A+1\operatorname{tr}A + 1, not just 11 — the trace term is easy to drop. This is the crux of the (A+I)(adj⁡A+I)(A + I)(\operatorname{adj}A + I) family of questions.

More JEE Mains Maths formula sheets