CDS Mathematics · Number System
Division, Parity & Consecutive Integers
The four primitives the whole chapter rests on: the division algorithm, odd-even bookkeeping, the fact that an odd square always leaves remainder 1 on division by 8, and the divisibility that a run of consecutive integers hands you for free.
Why this matters
Seventeen PYQs, four of them HARD — but the real weight of this page is indirect. The odd-square fact turns up in five questions spread across the chapter, the consecutive-integer rule silently solves a dozen more, and a quarter of every CDS Maths paper is written in one of three statement formats that you can learn to attack mechanically. Read this page as the toolkit you carry into the other eleven.
Concept 1 of 7
The division algorithm
Intuition
Definition
For integers and there are unique integers and with
- , and
- .
Here is the divisor, the quotient and the remainder. Uniqueness matters: there is only one such pair, so any consistent story about a division pins the number down completely.
Division algorithm
- Nthe number being divided (the dividend)
- dthe divisor
- qthe quotient
- rthe remainder, strictly less than d
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q24 · CDS (I) 2019 — Elementary Mathematics · 2019]
A remainder can never equal or exceed the divisor
Concept 2 of 7
Parity bookkeeping for sums and products
Intuition
Definition
Write every integer as even () or odd (). Then parity alone decides the parity of any sum, difference or product, whatever the actual values.
- The parity of a sum depends on how many odd terms there are, not on their size.
- A product is odd only when every factor is odd.
- Subtraction behaves exactly like addition for parity, since and are both odd.
| Expression | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| odd + odd | even | |
| odd + even | odd | one unpaired unit is left over |
| even + even | even | both are multiples of 2 |
| odd − odd | even | same as odd + odd for parity |
| odd × odd | odd | no factor of 2 anywhere |
| odd × even | even | one factor of 2 is enough |
| even × even | even | at least two factors of 2 |
| n(n+1) | always even | consecutive integers, so one of them is even This row does the most work in the chapter. Any expression of the form is even without exception, which is what collapses several CDS parity questions to a single line. |
| 2k ± any even | even | evens are closed under addition |
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q76 · CDS (I) 2023 — Elementary Mathematics · 2023]
An even product does not mean both factors are even
A statement about parity often says nothing about the variable you want
Concept 3 of 7
The square of an odd number leaves remainder 1 on division by 8
Intuition
Definition
For every odd integer , ; equivalently has the form . The one-line proof is the consecutive-integer rule in disguise: writing ,
- Every even power of an odd number also leaves remainder 1, since .
- The difference of the squares of two odd numbers is therefore a multiple of 8.
Odd square modulo 8
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q31 · CDS (I) 2026 — Elementary Mathematics · 2026]
Remainder 1 modulo 8 is a stronger claim than remainder 1 modulo 4
The rule is for ODD bases only
Concept 4 of 7
A product of consecutive integers is divisible by the factorial of how many there are
Intuition
Definition
The product of consecutive integers is divisible by .
- : is divisible by .
- : is divisible by .
- : a run of five is divisible by .
The examination skill is spotting the run, because it is usually disguised as a polynomial: and .
Consecutive-run divisibility
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q37 · CDS (I) 2023 — Elementary Mathematics · 2023]
The rule gives a guarantee, not the largest divisor
Concept 5 of 7
Centring a run of consecutive integers on its middle term
Intuition
Definition
For three consecutive integers written symmetrically as :
- their sum is , so it is always a multiple of 3;
- their sum of squares is ;
- their sum of cubes is , always a multiple of 9 for integer .
For an even-length run the midpoint is a half-integer, so use and around the centre instead. The principle is the same: symmetry kills the cross terms.
Sum of squares of three consecutive integers
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q12 · CDS (II) 2018 — Elementary Mathematics · 2018]
What is true for three consecutive integers is not true for four
Concept 6 of 7
Using the parity of a total to count the odd terms
Intuition
Definition
Suppose . Then the number of odd is even when is even, and odd when is odd.
- when is even and when is odd, so a sum of such terms counts parities directly.
- With terms, if of them are odd then .
- Having found the possible , check each one is actually attainable under the question's constraints before counting it.
Sum of parity signs
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q31 · CDS (I) 2023 — Elementary Mathematics · 2023]
Count the values that are ATTAINABLE, not the cases that are arithmetically allowed
Concept 7 of 7
The three statement formats CDS uses, and how to attack each
Intuition
Definition
The formats and their attacks:
- Consider the following statements (numbered 1, 2, 3): judge each statement independently, then match your verdict pattern to the option codes. One counterexample kills a statement outright.
- Data sufficiency (Statement-I, Statement-II): do not solve the problem. Ask only whether each statement pins the answer down uniquely, first alone and then together.
- Which one of the following is correct / is not correct: this is elimination, not derivation. Look for the option that overreaches with words like always, every, or must.
| Format | What it really asks | The attack |
|---|---|---|
| Consider the following statements 1, 2, 3 | Is each statement true, separately? | Test each on its own; hunt one counterexample per statement |
| Statement-I / Statement-II (data sufficiency) | Is the answer UNIQUE, not what the answer is | Check I alone, then II alone, then both; stop at uniqueness The commonest error is solving the problem instead of testing sufficiency. If a statement leaves two possible values, it is insufficient even when both are easy to find. |
| Which one is correct | Three options are false | Eliminate by counterexample rather than proving the survivor |
| Which one is NOT correct | Three options are true | Read the word NOT twice; the wrong answer is usually the true statement you liked CDS sets both polarities and prints them in the same typeface. Underline the word NOT before you start. |
| Two statements that say the same thing | Whether either adds anything | If both carry one fact, together they are still insufficient |
| Option offering none of the above | Whether your value is really absent | Recompute once; this option is occasionally the intended answer |
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
From the bank · past-year question
[Q61 · CDS (I) 2024 — Elementary Mathematics · 2024]
In data sufficiency, insufficient plus insufficient is not always sufficient
A statement question is not an all-or-nothing question
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (5)
- The division algorithm
Division algorithm
- The square of an odd number leaves remainder 1 on division by 8
Odd square modulo 8
- A product of consecutive integers is divisible by the factorial of how many there are
Consecutive-run divisibility
- Centring a run of consecutive integers on its middle term
Sum of squares of three consecutive integers
- Using the parity of a total to count the odd terms
Sum of parity signs
Reference tables (2)
Parity bookkeeping for sums and products9 rows
| Expression | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| odd + odd | even | |
| odd + even | odd | one unpaired unit is left over |
| even + even | even | both are multiples of 2 |
| odd − odd | even | same as odd + odd for parity |
| odd × odd | odd | no factor of 2 anywhere |
| odd × even | even | one factor of 2 is enough |
| even × even | even | at least two factors of 2 |
| n(n+1) | always even | consecutive integers, so one of them is even This row does the most work in the chapter. Any expression of the form is even without exception, which is what collapses several CDS parity questions to a single line. |
| 2k ± any even | even | evens are closed under addition |
The three statement formats CDS uses, and how to attack each6 rows
| Format | What it really asks | The attack |
|---|---|---|
| Consider the following statements 1, 2, 3 | Is each statement true, separately? | Test each on its own; hunt one counterexample per statement |
| Statement-I / Statement-II (data sufficiency) | Is the answer UNIQUE, not what the answer is | Check I alone, then II alone, then both; stop at uniqueness The commonest error is solving the problem instead of testing sufficiency. If a statement leaves two possible values, it is insufficient even when both are easy to find. |
| Which one is correct | Three options are false | Eliminate by counterexample rather than proving the survivor |
| Which one is NOT correct | Three options are true | Read the word NOT twice; the wrong answer is usually the true statement you liked CDS sets both polarities and prints them in the same typeface. Underline the word NOT before you start. |
| Two statements that say the same thing | Whether either adds anything | If both carry one fact, together they are still insufficient |
| Option offering none of the above | Whether your value is really absent | Recompute once; this option is occasionally the intended answer |
Watch out for (10)
- A remainder can never equal or exceed the divisor→ The division algorithm
- An even product does not mean both factors are even→ Parity bookkeeping for sums and products
- A statement about parity often says nothing about the variable you want→ Parity bookkeeping for sums and products
- Remainder 1 modulo 8 is a stronger claim than remainder 1 modulo 4→ The square of an odd number leaves remainder 1 on division by 8
- The rule is for ODD bases only→ The square of an odd number leaves remainder 1 on division by 8
- The rule gives a guarantee, not the largest divisor→ A product of consecutive integers is divisible by the factorial of how many there are
- What is true for three consecutive integers is not true for four→ Centring a run of consecutive integers on its middle term
- Count the values that are ATTAINABLE, not the cases that are arithmetically allowed→ Using the parity of a total to count the odd terms
- In data sufficiency, insufficient plus insufficient is not always sufficient→ The three statement formats CDS uses, and how to attack each
- A statement question is not an all-or-nothing question→ The three statement formats CDS uses, and how to attack each
Drill every past-year question on this subtopic
17 questions from the bank — paginated, with cart and Word-export support.