CDS Mathematics · Number System
Prime Numbers & Primality
What a prime is, how to test one by trial division up to the square root, why a question about primes summing to something odd almost always forces one of them to be 2, and which plausible prime-generating forms are traps.
Why this matters
Twenty-two PYQs and not one of them rated HARD — this is the most reliable unit in the chapter. Almost every question is recall or a single structural argument. The one argument to own is the parity move that pins a prime to 2: it appears in five of the twenty-two and turns a search into a one-line deduction.
Concept 1 of 6: Primes, composites, and the numbers that are neither
Definition
A positive integer is prime if its only positive divisors are 1 and ; otherwise it is composite.
- is neither prime nor composite — it has exactly one divisor.
- is the only even prime, which is why parity arguments are so powerful here.
- There are 25 primes below 100, and 15 below 50.
- Two numbers are coprime (relatively prime) when their HCF is 1; neither needs to be prime.
| Claim | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 is prime | False | It has one divisor, not two |
| 1 is composite | False | It is neither |
| 2 is prime | True | Divisors 1 and 2 only |
| Every prime is odd | False | 2 is even This is the single most useful exception in the chapter — it is what lets you force one prime to be 2. |
| Number of primes below 100 | 25 | 2, 3, 5, ..., 89, 97 |
| Number of primes below 50 | 15 | So 10 lie between 50 and 100 |
| Possible unit digits of a prime | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 | Six digits; 0, 4, 6, 8 give an even number above 2 |
| Smallest odd composite | 9 | 1 is neither; 3, 5, 7 are prime |
| A product of two composites can be coprime | True | 4 and 9 share no prime factor |
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 1 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
Coprime does not mean prime
Concept 2 of 6: Testing a number for primality by trial division
Definition
To test : divide by each prime with . If none divides , then is prime.
- Only primes need testing, since any composite divisor carries a smaller prime one.
- Useful square-root landmarks: , , , .
So a three-digit number needs primes only up to 31, and a number below 2500 only up to 47.
Trial-division bound
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
Numbers near 400 or 1000 look prime and often are not
Concept 3 of 6: Forcing a prime to be 2 with a parity argument
Definition
The argument in its usual forms:
- Odd total. A sum of two primes is odd only if one of them is even, i.e. equals 2.
- Odd count. Three odd primes sum to an odd number; if the target is even, one prime is 2.
- Even product. If a product of primes is even, one factor is 2.
- Both sum and difference prime. If and are odd primes then and are both even, and they cannot both be 2 — so one of is 2.
The forcing rule
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
Having forced the 2, still check the survivor is prime
Concept 4 of 6: Coprimality and Euclid's lemma
Definition
and are coprime when .
- Consecutive integers are always coprime: any common divisor divides their difference, which is 1.
- If is coprime to both and , it is coprime to — no new prime factor appears in a product.
- Euclid's lemma: if a prime divides then or . This needs prime: but divides neither.
- If and , then .
Coprimality via the difference
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 4 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
Euclid's lemma needs the divisor to be PRIME
Concept 5 of 6: Forms that look like they generate primes but do not
Definition
The distinction that matters is direction:
- Every prime greater than 3 is of the form — that direction is true.
- But a number of the form need not be prime. The converse fails, and confusing the two directions is the whole trap.
Twin primes are pairs differing by 2; a prime triple spaced by 2 exists only once, as .
| Form or claim | Always prime? | First failure |
|---|---|---|
| No | gives | |
| No | gives | |
| Every prime is | True | This is the valid direction True one way, false the other. The question always tests the false direction. |
| (Mersenne) | No | gives |
| No | gives | |
| Product of first primes, plus 1 | No | gives It is prime for to — 3, 7, 31, 211, 2311 — which is why the statement looks safe. |
| Prime triples spaced by 2 | Only once | ; one of any such triple is a multiple of 3 |
| Difference of two primes | Always even | Both are odd |
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 5 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
The converse of a true statement about primes is usually false
Concept 6 of 6: Breaking a number into its prime factors
Definition
Every integer above 1 factorises into primes in exactly one way (the fundamental theorem of arithmetic). Procedure: try in turn, dividing out each prime as many times as it goes, and stop when the remaining quotient is less than the square of the next prime — the quotient is then prime. The alternating-sum test for 11 is worth having ready here, because 11 is the first divisor that no other quick rule catches.
Unique factorisation
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 6 · Number System · Prime Numbers and Primality
The LCM of two distinct primes is their product
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Formulas (4)
- Testing a number for primality by trial division
Trial-division bound
- Forcing a prime to be 2 with a parity argument
The forcing rule
- Coprimality and Euclid's lemma
Coprimality via the difference
- Breaking a number into its prime factors
Unique factorisation
Reference tables (2)
Primes, composites, and the numbers that are neither9 rows
| Claim | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 is prime | False | It has one divisor, not two |
| 1 is composite | False | It is neither |
| 2 is prime | True | Divisors 1 and 2 only |
| Every prime is odd | False | 2 is even This is the single most useful exception in the chapter — it is what lets you force one prime to be 2. |
| Number of primes below 100 | 25 | 2, 3, 5, ..., 89, 97 |
| Number of primes below 50 | 15 | So 10 lie between 50 and 100 |
| Possible unit digits of a prime | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 | Six digits; 0, 4, 6, 8 give an even number above 2 |
| Smallest odd composite | 9 | 1 is neither; 3, 5, 7 are prime |
| A product of two composites can be coprime | True | 4 and 9 share no prime factor |
Forms that look like they generate primes but do not8 rows
| Form or claim | Always prime? | First failure |
|---|---|---|
| No | gives | |
| No | gives | |
| Every prime is | True | This is the valid direction True one way, false the other. The question always tests the false direction. |
| (Mersenne) | No | gives |
| No | gives | |
| Product of first primes, plus 1 | No | gives It is prime for to — 3, 7, 31, 211, 2311 — which is why the statement looks safe. |
| Prime triples spaced by 2 | Only once | ; one of any such triple is a multiple of 3 |
| Difference of two primes | Always even | Both are odd |
Watch out for (6)
- Coprime does not mean prime→ Primes, composites, and the numbers that are neither
- Numbers near 400 or 1000 look prime and often are not→ Testing a number for primality by trial division
- Having forced the 2, still check the survivor is prime→ Forcing a prime to be 2 with a parity argument
- Euclid's lemma needs the divisor to be PRIME→ Coprimality and Euclid's lemma
- The converse of a true statement about primes is usually false→ Forms that look like they generate primes but do not
- The LCM of two distinct primes is their product→ Breaking a number into its prime factors
Test yourself on Number System
20 past CDS questions from this chapter, timed at 24 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.