SSC CGL Reasoning · Syllogism
Three-Statement Syllogism
Three statements that link four groups in a chain, with two or three conclusions to test, some of them about what is possible rather than what is certain.
Why this matters
Ninety-four questions in the bank, 41 from the 2023 shifts, 40 from the 2024 shifts and 13 from the 2025 shifts, with 62 EASY and 32 MODERATE. The rules are the two-statement ones used twice along the chain, so the work is finding which pair of statements each conclusion depends on.
Concept 1 of 3: Following a chain of All and Some
Definition
1. Write the chain in order: A, B, C, D, with All or Some between each pair. 2. For each conclusion, find the two groups it names and the statements between them. 3. Join step by step. All then All stays All; Some then All gives Some; a Some followed by a Some, or an All followed by a Some, breaks the chain. 4. Many conclusions are just one statement turned round ("Some C are B" from "Some B are C"). Check those first: they follow at once.
- Fast route: once one conclusion fails, strike every option that includes it, and test only the conclusions the remaining options differ on.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 1 · Syllogism · Three-Statement Syllogism
Carrying an All across a Some
Taking the order of the words for the order of the chain
Concept 2 of 3: Chains with a No statement
Definition
- Inside a group kept apart: if All A are B and No B is C, then No A is C.
- Overlapping a group kept apart: if Some A are B and No B is C, then Some A are not C.
- Beyond the No: a No statement says nothing about groups that only overlap the far side. In "Some A are B, No B is C, Some C are D", nothing definite links A and D.
- A conclusion that contradicts a No statement ("Some B are C" against "No B is C") never follows.
- Fast route: find the No statement first, then ask for each conclusion whether its groups are fully inside the two kept apart.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 2 · Syllogism · Three-Statement Syllogism
Spreading a No to the whole group
Drawing a conclusion across the No
Concept 3 of 3: Conclusions about what is possible
Definition
- A possibility follows when the statements leave room for it: there is no definite link either way, and nothing forbids it.
- It does not follow when a statement rules it out: "Some A can be C" fails if No A is C is already certain.
- "All A can never be C" follows when some A are certainly not C, or when No A is C.
- "At least some A are C" is a definite claim, not a possibility; test it with the joining rules.
- Fast route: for each possibility conclusion, look only for a No statement that forbids it. If there is none, it follows.
Worked example
Practice this conceptself-check · 4 quick reps
The same idea in a real exam question:
Example 3 · Syllogism · Three-Statement Syllogism
Rejecting a possibility because it is not certain
Treating "At least some" as a possibility
Summary — formulas & gotchas at a glance
A revision cheat-sheet for the formulas and gotchas above. Click any concept name to jump back to its full explanation.
Watch out for (6)
- Carrying an All across a Some→ Following a chain of All and Some
- Taking the order of the words for the order of the chain→ Following a chain of All and Some
- Spreading a No to the whole group→ Chains with a No statement
- Drawing a conclusion across the No→ Chains with a No statement
- Rejecting a possibility because it is not certain→ Conclusions about what is possible
- Treating "At least some" as a possibility→ Conclusions about what is possible
Test yourself on Syllogism
20 past SSC CGL questions from this chapter, timed at 12 minutes and marked the way the exam marks it. You see your score and every answer the moment you finish. Free to start.